The first forensic framework designed to document, measure and litigate technology-facilitated abuse (TFA-IDDS), directed energy threats and cognitive warfare — with judicial admissibility standards.
Why PEM?
Traditional analytical frameworks — in law, forensic investigation and risk analysis — depend on linear causality: discrete events, identifiable actors, direct causal links. That model works in stable contexts. But contemporary sociotechnological ecosystems overwhelm it.
Signals are scattered across multiple layers — insignificant in isolation, revealing when aggregated over time. Discrete-event frameworks fail to capture them.
Feedback loops between human behavior and algorithmic systems progressively reinforce patterns, making it impossible to isolate a single causal event.
Harms are emergent properties of the system, not direct consequences of individual actions. Liability is distributed across subsystems whose interaction produces the damage without any single one causing it in isolation.
Who we serve
Each case is different, but the methodology is the same: progressive evidence, instrumented measurement and legal architecture designed for the courtroom.
Cyberstalking, spyware, GPS trackers, smart home devices, directed energy, acoustic weapons. If you experience technological interference and need instrumented evidence.
Validation → Logbook → Expert ReportCorporate espionage protection, advanced technical sweeps and environmental integrity certification for boardrooms, VIP hotels and sensitive facilities.
AISE Secure Environment CertificationExpert reports with traceability, chain of custody and admissibility standards. AI, neurotechnologies, neurodata and sensitive data protection.
Forensic Pipeline → Expert ReportScientific methodology
PEM applies abductive reasoning and structural mechanism analysis — the same epistemological standard used in forensic clinical diagnostics and international criminal investigation.
Methodological validity standards for judicial expertise. Every PEM instrument meets reproducibility and documentation criteria.
Documented methodological chain of custody at every pipeline step. SHA-256 for instrumental data.
Abductive criteria with defined falsifiable hypotheses. Every claim has explicit refutation conditions.
About us
NeuroEthics.cl is the operational platform of the NeuroEthics Research Lab, dedicated to the intersection of neuroscience, technology, governance and law.
Multidisciplinary team accredited by the Supreme Court of Chile, with backgrounds in engineering, neuroscience and technology law.
Operator of the full PEM Security Ecosystem. Expert services, AISE certification and forensic analysis.
Ethical gatekeeper. Case validation, logbook access, advocacy and public policy.